Platform logo
Explore Communities
27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) logo
27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)Community hosting publication
There is an updated version of this publication, open Version 2 .
conference paper

Four archetypes of Open Science Partnerships: Connecting aims and means in open research collaborations

[version 1; peer review: 2 accepted]

21/04/2023| By
Maria-Theresa Maria-Theresa Norn,
+ 2
Thomas Thomas Ryan
585 Views
0 Comments
Disciplines
Keywords
Abstract

A growing number of Open Science Partnerships (OSPs) have emerged around the world. These are precompetitive public-private research partnerships that adhere to principles of open science, which includes putting the research outputs into the public domain and precluding participants from seeking Intellectual Property (IP) rights protection on these outputs. Despite the growing interest in OSPs, they have been the subject of limited scholarly attention. To remedy this situation, we examine the similarities and differences of OSPs. Based on a comparative, qualitative study of five OSPs in biomedicine, we propose two crucial dimensions in OSP design - research aims of the partnership and degree of industry orientation - as the basis for four archetypes of OSPs. These archetypes are intended to provide a starting point for further research and for practitioners wishing to ensure that means applied match the desired ends that motivated the OSP.

Submitted by21 Apr 2023
User Avatar
Maria-Theresa Norn
Aarhus University
Download Publication

More details

  • License: CC BY
  • Review type: Open Review
  • Publication type: Conference Paper
  • Conference: 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)
  • Publisher: International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators

No reviews to show. Please remember to LOG IN as some reviews may be only visible to specific users.

ReviewerDecisionType
User Avatar
Hidden Identity
Accepted
Peer Review
User Avatar
Hidden Identity
Accepted
Peer Review