Platform logo
Explore Communities
27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023) logo
27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)Community hosting publication
You are watching the latest version of this publication, Version 1.
conference paper

Evaluating international strategic partnerships between universities

[version 1; peer review: 1 accepted]

10/05/2023| By
Niki Niki Vermeulen,
+ 4
Mayline Mayline Strouk
1083 Views
0 Comments
Disciplines
Keywords
Abstract

The University of Edinburgh is involved in a range of strategic partnerships, and noticed a lack of consistent, aligned evaluation practices. It proved a challenge to assess whether to enter into an agreement with a potential partner, or whether a strategic partnership indeed delivered its expectations, let alone to discuss this with their strategic partners. They invited five of their strategic partners to join hands to develop an evaluation framework, based on state-of-the-art literature leading to clear assessments of strategic partnerships. Leiden University’s CWTS and the University of Edinburgh's Science, Technology and Innovation Studies (STIS) were asked to contribute to the project given expertise in research governance and assessment, including collaboration and internationalization. We decided to co-create the framework with the international officers, which resulted in an evaluation framework. This looks unlike anything imagined, but it is changing the way in which evaluation thinking is integrated in practice.

Submitted by10 May 2023
User Avatar
Niki Vermeulen
University of Edinburgh
Download Publication

More details

  • License: CC BY
  • Review type: Open Review
  • Publication type: Conference Paper
  • Conference: 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)
  • Publisher: International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators
ReviewerDecisionType
User Avatar
Hidden Identity
Accepted
Peer Review