Detecting academic misconduct is a vital task, and reader comments have become a key source for identifying such misconduct. This study aims to investigate whether tweets can predict the retraction of articles. A total of 3,505 retracted articles mentioned on Twitter from 2012 to 2021 were collected, and the Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) method was used to gather 3,505 non-retracted articles with similar features, along with all relevant tweets. The study analyzed the tweets through keyword identification, machine learning methods, and ChatGPT. The results showed that tweets could predict the retraction of articles to some extent, but the predictive performance of each model still needs to be improved. ChatGPT showed higher accuracy in predicting article retractions than other models, and could assist manual prediction, accelerating the purification of academic misconduct. However, the ChatGPT prediction method still has issues with logical inference and over-interpretation, which need to be improved in future studies.
Show LessZheng, E., Fu, H. & Fang, Z. (2023). Can ChatGPT predict article retraction through tweets? [version 2; peer review: 1 accepted, 1 major revision] [preprint]. 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). https://doi.org/10.55835/644126a8763e8d2091a0cfdc
No reviews to show. Please remember to LOG IN as some reviews may be only visible to specific users.